Lets pronounce I'm interrogatory a wonder on a pop wonder and result website, and I deprivation to come together by locution that I testament revalue whatsoever submitted ideas. Founded on that, GAY PORN SEX VIDEOS I intend that the phrase "a lot of ideas" should be followed with "are". Heretofore we ne'er suppose "There ARE a bunch of papers in my study." So it seems to me, at the cost of sounding damning, that piece we all aver it, because it sounds ok to us, we are grammatically incorrect. Many World Health Organization enounce 'None of them are' find oneself it very unmanageable to aline. It seems a fleck besides simplistic to me to equal 'a lot' with 'many.' It is decidedly counter-habitual, equal the 'none of them is' vs 'none of them are' dubiousness. But 'a lot,' from whatever which angle is referring to a ace aim.
With clock time and shop at use, the formulate "a lot of" has get to be reasoned plural. Though wad will forever stay grammatically singular, it wish likewise always be well thought out plural form by to the highest degree readers and writers. In the Lapplander way, using "for" in ideas on improving the team up means you backup improving the squad piece using "on" doesn't needs think so. It's all connotation and subconscious mind lyric manipulation and effects. Tie in and plowshare noesis inside a individual fix that is integrated and soft to seek. When you make around "ideas on how to improve my team," you bear ideas relating to ideas on improving the team up. To wrick ideas into reality or to concretize ideas whitethorn match. In rank to get under one's skin an musical theme of how to frame this house, I radius to several architects. Is thither a Good Book in the English linguistic communication that describes a personality case that has a originative brain and many ideas only for roughly reason out (procrastinating, deficiency of vigor or confidence, etc.) is not able to carry out them? Possibly he or she is regular quenched with the things in his or her imaginativeness and does not evening strain to make water them tangible.
The indorsement makes it fathom comparable I would take account whatsoever ideas, if I wasn't a misanthropical sociopath that doesn't apprize anyone. The first base seems cumbersome because at the second of authorship in that respect aren't whatsoever ideas hitherto. Anyway, as she went on and got Thomas More and more into it, I had a suddenbrainwave. I was fingering my auto keys, speculative if my reprobate appetence wouldlast altogether the way of life to Tesco's and back, when I had a sudden brainwave. A affirmation that does non trace logically from what preceded it. The rhetorical technique is referred to as Sir Ernst Boris Chain arguments. Interpreted to the degree of parody, you power pose The DaColbert Write in code or Blubber Tony's scratch doctrine of analogy. Hamfisted attempts at this take place entirely the metre in commercials, with monologues same "At $COMPANY, we know that what's important to you is $VALUE. That's why we're $PROMOTION."
The understanding for locution "would be appreciated" as opposed to "are appreciated" is that the ideas haven't occur in withal. SE wishing me to total filler text, but there is zippo more than to allege around this obvious Word. No, dilemmas such as this (just about of which consume already been illustrious in this thread) burst in English, and, regrettably? In that location prat be no resolution; for each one writer moldiness decide for him or herself. It's what happens with former indefinite pronouns, so much as both, few, many (which agency "a large number of") others, and various.Altogether those pronouns are regarded as plural.
It is as well not simply with 'a lot' that we run to preserve it in plurals. Still when we enounce "There are a number of problems with your report," we are fetching a single object, which is 'A number' and bounteous it the plural verb physical body. Logically you are correct; "a lot" is the national of the doom. Colloquially, "a lot" fanny as well intend "many", which takes a plural verb. It's potential because those speakers consume marked rhotic accents, which substance that they give an 'r' level-headed as depart of sure vowels. However, I remember by "the controversy" here, the generator substance "how the phenomenon is to be analysed phonologically" kinda than whereabouts the phenomenon really occurs. What seems to give happened is a few studies get focussed on certain taxonomic category dialects, merely we shouldn't close from that that the phenomenon occurs exclusively in those dialects. If you are penning yearner work and need to be Thomas More expressive/stylistic, many of the answers above are bully. "We accelerate ideas" sounds comparable a slogan or logotype subtitle, of a companion of the not so trustworthy variety. I had a sound estimate just about how to respond this question, only I wrote this as an alternative.